Background: NAFLD/MASLD is driven partly by chronic low-grade inflammation, and diet is a modifiable determinant.
Objective: To synthesise RCT and mechanistic evidence on whether Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) adherence lowers
inflammatory biomarkers in NAFLD. Methods: Narrative review of RCTs, meta-analyses, and mechanistic studies from PubMed
and Europe PMC. Findings: MedDiet reduces hepatic steatosis and modestly lowers CRP, IL-6, and TNF-alpha versus
low-fat/usual-care, partly independent of weight loss. Conclusions: MedDiet adherence is a plausible, evidence-supported
adjunct for attenuating NAFLD-related inflammation, though effects remain modest and heterogeneous.
Keywords: Mediterranean diet; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; inflammation; C-reactive protein; hepatic steatosis
Background: NAFLD/MASLD is driven partly by chronic low-grade inflammation, and diet is a modifiable determinant [1]. Objective: To synthesise RCT and mechanistic evidence on whether Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) adherence lowers inflammatory biomarkers in NAFLD. Methods: Narrative review of RCTs, meta-analyses, and mechanistic studies from PubMed and Europe PMC. Findings: MedDiet reduces hepatic steatosis and modestly lowers CRP, IL-6, and TNF-alpha versus low-fat/usual-care, partly independent of weight loss [2,3]. Conclusions: MedDiet adherence is a plausible, evidence-supported adjunct for attenuating NAFLD-related inflammation, though effects remain modest and heterogeneous.
Keywords: Mediterranean diet; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; inflammation; C-reactive protein; hepatic steatosis
NAFLD, recently reframed as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), affects roughly a third of adults worldwide and is projected to keep rising with obesity and type 2 diabetes prevalence [1,4]. The 2023 multi-society nomenclature change reflects growing consensus that hepatic steatosis is inseparable from cardiometabolic dysfunction, and that "positive" metabolic criteria, rather than exclusion of alcohol alone, should define the disease [5]. Central to progression from simple steatosis to steatohepatitis and fibrosis is a self-perpetuating cycle of lipotoxicity, adipose-tissue dysfunction, gut-derived endotoxemia, and cytokine release—the "multiple parallel hits" model, which supplanted the older, overly linear "two-hit" hypothesis [6,7]. Circulating C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) are elevated in NAFLD and track with histological severity and cardiovascular risk, making them attractive, non-invasive surrogate endpoints for dietary intervention trials where serial liver biopsy is impractical.
The Mediterranean diet (MedDiet)—rich in extra-virgin olive oil, vegetables, legumes, fish, and whole grains, and low in red meat, refined carbohydrates, and processed food—reduces cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in large primary-prevention cohorts and trials [8,9]. Because insulin resistance and systemic inflammation are shared substrates of cardiometabolic disease and NAFLD, professional guidelines now endorse MedDiet as the preferred first-line lifestyle intervention for NAFLD, independent of overall caloric restriction or resultant weight loss [10,11]. Despite this endorsement, the specific evidence base linking MedDiet adherence to changes in circulating inflammatory biomarkers—as opposed to imaging-based steatosis or standard liver enzymes—is more scattered across smaller trials and secondary analyses. This review asks a focused question: what does the accumulated RCT, meta-analytic, and mechanistic literature show about MedDiet adherence and inflammatory biomarkers specifically in NAFLD/MASLD populations, and how might this inform clinical practice?
This article is a narrative review of published literature, not a report of a new clinical trial. We searched PubMed, Europe PMC, and Google Scholar (through 2026) using combinations of the terms "Mediterranean diet," "NAFLD," "MASLD," "inflammation," "C-reactive protein," "IL-6," "TNF-alpha," "adiponectin," "gut microbiota," and "randomized controlled trial." We prioritised randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews/meta-analyses conducted in biopsy- or imaging-confirmed NAFLD/MASLD cohorts, supplemented with mechanistic, microbiome, and genetic-interaction studies clarifying plausible biological pathways, and with foundational epidemiological and clinical-guideline documents providing context for interpreting biomarker findings [12]. Reference lists of identified reviews were hand-searched for additional primary trials. Because this is a narrative rather than systematic synthesis, no formal risk-of-bias scoring or meta-analytic pooling was performed; instead, findings are integrated qualitatively, prioritising larger and more rigorously conducted studies where evidence conflicts.
Hepatic steatosis promotes Kupffer-cell activation, nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB) signalling, endoplasmic-reticulum stress, and adipokine imbalance (reduced adiponectin, elevated leptin and resistin), which together sustain systemic low-grade inflammation and recruit circulating monocytes into hepatic tissue [6]. Excess free fatty acid flux from dysfunctional visceral adipose tissue further activates toll-like receptor-4 signalling on Kupffer cells, amplifying TNF-alpha and IL-6 output and creating the substrate for progression to steatohepatitis [7]. Genetic susceptibility, notably the PNPLA3 I148M variant, appears to interact with dietary quality to modulate hepatic inflammation and fibrosis risk, suggesting that diet-based anti-inflammatory strategies may have heterogeneous efficacy across genotypes and that genotype-stratified trial analyses are warranted [13]. Polyphenols in extra-virgin olive oil (hydroxytyrosol, oleocanthal, and tyrosol) inhibit NF-kB translocation, scavenge reactive oxygen species, and reduce oxidative stress markers in hepatocyte and macrophage models, offering a direct mechanistic bridge between the MedDiet's defining fat source and reduced hepatic inflammation independent of total energy intake [14]. Together, these pathways provide biological plausibility for a diet-driven, weight-independent reduction in circulating inflammatory biomarkers among patients with NAFLD.
[2,3,16,18].
Several RCTs conducted specifically in NAFLD populations have tested MedDiet against low-fat or standard-care comparators, with inflammation typically assessed as a secondary outcome alongside imaging or biopsy-based steatosis. Ryan and colleagues showed that a 6-week MedDiet reduced hepatic steatosis (by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy) and improved insulin sensitivity relative to a habitual low-fat diet, notably without significant weight loss, arguing against weight change as the sole mediator of benefit [2]. The larger, longer Properzi trial found that both ad libitum MedDiet and conventional low-fat diets reduced hepatic steatosis over twelve months, with MedDiet additionally improving overall diet quality scores and serum triglycerides, though between-group differences in inflammatory markers were more modest than differences in steatosis [3]. The dedicated MEDINA trial, run in Australia, demonstrated that a structured MedDiet intervention improved hepatic and metabolic outcomes relative to low-fat dietary advice, including favourable shifts in serum adiponectin—an anti-inflammatory, insulin-sensitising adipokine that is characteristically depressed in NAFLD [15,16]. Most recently, a twelve-week trial directly comparing MedDiet with a low-fat diet found comparable rates of MASLD resolution regardless of PNPLA3 genotype, reinforcing that dietary-quality benefits likely extend across genetic risk strata rather than being confined to a genetically susceptible subgroup [17]. Table 1 summarises these representative trials and their principal inflammatory or metabolic findings, and Figure 1 illustrates the approximate direction and magnitude of CRP change reported for MedDiet versus comparator arms across these interventions.
A recent RCT in patients with confirmed NAFLD reported that twelve weeks of MedDiet significantly reduced malondialdehyde, oxidised LDL, and several pro-inflammatory cytokines compared with standard dietary advice, alongside improvements in liver enzymes, supporting a coupled oxidative-stress and inflammatory response to dietary pattern change [18]. Broader systematic reviews and meta-analyses conducted in general adult populations, rather than NAFLD cohorts specifically, corroborate modest but statistically consistent reductions in CRP and IL-6 with high MedDiet adherence, alongside smaller and often non-significant effects on TNF-alpha, which appears more resistant to short-term dietary modification than the acute-phase reactants [19]. A meta-analysis restricted specifically to olive-oil-supplemented MedDiet regimens found significant reductions in CRP together with soluble adhesion molecules (sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1), biomarkers of endothelial activation that are mechanistically linked to hepatic sinusoidal inflammation and to the elevated cardiovascular risk that dominates mortality in NAFLD cohorts [20]. Taken together, the biomarker literature suggests a hierarchy of responsiveness—CRP and adhesion molecules appear most sensitive to MedDiet adherence, IL-6 intermediate, and TNF-alpha least responsive—though head-to-head comparisons within a single NAFLD trial remain scarce. Table 2 compiles pooled or trial-reported biomarker effect estimates from these syntheses, and Figure 2 depicts the approximate relative percentage change in CRP, IL-6, TNF-alpha, and sICAM-1 attributable to MedDiet interventions.
The MedDiet's high fibre, resistant-starch, and polyphenol content favourably reshapes gut microbiota composition, increasing short-chain-fatty-acid (SCFA)-producing taxa such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Bifidobacterium while reducing pro-inflammatory Proteobacteria [21]. SCFAs such as butyrate strengthen intestinal tight-junction integrity and mucus-layer thickness, limiting portal endotoxemia driven by lipopolysaccharide translocation—a key upstream driver of hepatic Kupffer-cell activation within the multiple-hits model [22]. In NAFLD patients specifically, combining a low-glycemic-index MedDiet with aerobic physical activity rearranged gut microbiota signatures alongside measurable metabolic improvement, supporting a diet-microbiome-inflammation axis that is at least partly distinct from, and additive to, weight loss alone [23]. These mechanistic and microbiome findings converge with clinical observations that MedDiet benefits on hepatic fat and systemic inflammation are not fully explained by caloric restriction, implying that food quality and pattern—not calories alone—drive at least part of the anti-inflammatory effect [24]. This microbiome-mediated pathway also offers a plausible explanation for why MedDiet effects on inflammatory markers can appear before, or independent of, measurable weight change in
Weight loss of 7-10% of body weight remains the single most powerful lever for histological improvement in NASH, including fibrosis regression at higher thresholds [25], and exercise independently reduces hepatic fat through mechanisms that partly overlap with dietary anti-inflammatory pathways, including improved insulin sensitivity and reduced visceral adiposity [26]. Nonetheless, MedDiet adherence offers benefits that are at least partly independent of weight change, is more sustainable long-term than restrictive calorie-counting approaches, carries strong cardiovascular co-benefits highly relevant to a population whose leading cause of death is cardiovascular disease rather than liver failure, and aligns with current EASL-EASD-EASO and AASLD guidance recommending it as first-line dietary counselling for NAFLD/MASLD [10,11]. Clinically, this evidence base supports integrating validated MedDiet adherence screening tools into routine hepatology and primary-care encounters, with structured referral to dietitian-led nutrition counselling for patients who show elevated inflammatory biomarkers, high fibrosis risk scores, or poor baseline dietary quality. Combining MedDiet counselling with structured exercise prescription and, where appropriate, modest calorie reduction likely offers additive anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic benefit beyond either approach alone, though this combined strategy has been tested less rigorously than either component individually.
Across mechanistic, epidemiological, and randomized trial evidence, Mediterranean diet adherence is consistently associated with reduced hepatic steatosis and with modest, biologically coherent reductions in CRP, IL-6, and related inflammatory and endothelial-activation markers among patients with NAFLD/MASLD, likely mediated through reduced lipotoxicity, olive-oil polyphenol signalling on hepatocyte and macrophage NF-kB pathways, and favourable, SCFA-enriched gut microbiota shifts that limit portal endotoxemia. Effect sizes on individual cytokines remain heterogeneous across trials, differ by biomarker (CRP and adhesion molecules appearing more responsive than TNF-alpha), and are not yet clearly stratified by genotype, trial duration, or baseline adherence level. Larger, longer, biomarker-standardised RCTs with harmonised MedDiet adherence scoring and pre-specified inflammatory endpoints are needed to define optimal adherence thresholds, clarify genotype-specific responses such as those related to PNPLA3, and establish whether biomarker improvement translates into reduced rates of fibrosis progression and cardiovascular events over years rather than weeks. Until such trials mature, MedDiet adherence should be promoted, as current EASL-EASD-EASO and AASLD guidance already recommends, as a first-line, evidence-supported, cardiovascular-protective lifestyle strategy for reducing systemic inflammatory burden in patients with NAFLD/MASLD, ideally alongside structured physical activity and individualised weight-management support.